Seeing my name in print will always give me a small thrill. Less so, perhaps, than when I was young and keen and chronicled my every article in a scrapbook – but a small thrill, nonetheless.
When your complete works consists of a dozen or so published articles, it’s easy to keep track. You can file them proudly, admire them often, and stare at your own name as if you almost can’t believe it’s there, in print. But when your total number of written articles gets into four-figure territory, you no longer have the time, energy or inclination to catalogue each one. Or any of them, for that matter.
What also gives me a thrill is seeing the bylines of writers I know, respect, like or love. I like recognising their writing style, admiring their wit, seeing the finished version of a story I know has been a hell of a lot of work in creating. Those quotes that took three days of phonecalls to get, finally there, for others to read.
The same quotes, incidentally, that someone includes in a blog a few days later, with no mention of the source, with no link to the original. Just a blatant lifting of text and passing off as someone else’s. And I’m seeing it over and over again.
One of the few things I remember from my degree (English literature – I have half-read a lot of classic books) is the idea of intertextuality, of nothing being original, of every piece of writing in the world resembling another. They say it’s the same with songs, that nothing is unique anymore, that one hit song has the exact same chord pattern as another. And that is true with words, and with pictures. Thanks to the internet and the improvements in technology, we are all musicians, writers, photographers, and there’s only so many chords/words/images to go round.
In the photography world, things are even worse and theft, copyright issues and plagiarism is rife. I have one professional image on my Facebook profile of me competing my horse in his first Combined Training event. I bought the print from the photographer, and I paid £3 extra to have a web resolution jpeg that was specifically allowed for use on websites, social media pages and adverts. Just £3. Not much to ask.
Yet I constantly see people with professional images, copied and pasted, often with watermark still intact. “I used my Photoshop skills to get rid of the watermark!” boasted one Facebook user recently, underneath a professional’s photo. Why not? Why should the photographer make any money? Yes he’s spent hours at a show, he’s bought all his equipment, he’s uploaded hundreds of images to his website, but surely he’s doing it all for fun? He doesn’t need to be paid for his efforts.
When I was a student, amid not finishing my set texts and worrying about intertextuality, I dreamed of being a journalist. So I wrote for the Student paper, I did work experience stints on a magazine where I mostly made coffees and hoped against hope to be asked to write something, and I spent a few weeks proofreading at a local newspaper where I could spell better than everyone else.
A decade on, and everyone is a writer. Everyone is a photographer. Everyone has a blog. Is there anyone left who is prepared to just make the coffees and hope?
My Mum’s husband wrote recently about people “finding their own way in this wonderful world of inventive words” and I thought that was a lovely sentiment – but at what cost? There are people who write, or take pictures, or make songs, because they love to, and it makes them happy, and that’s an amazing thing.
There are also people who want more, who hope to make careers in the creative world, who want to build up that elusive scrapbook of press cuttings, or their portfolio of images, and they’ll do anything and go anywhere for free, just to get that break into the industry, and I admire them too.
The danger is that when everyone wants to make it, when anyone will give their work away for free, when words and images are so plentiful that no one will ever deem them worthy of payment. Maybe we’re heading for a time when all creativity is a hobby, and there’ll be no professionals left at all.